The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions after cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: patients with cancer who smoke have more side effects during and after treatment, and a lower survival rate than patients with cancer who quit smoking. Supporting patients with cancer to quit smoking should be standard care. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the most effective smoking cessation method for patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched. Included were randomized controlled trials and observational studies published after January 2000 with any smoking cessation intervention in patients with any type of cancer. Result of these studies were evaluated in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18,780 papers were retrieved. After duplicate removal and exclusion based on title and abstract, 72 publications were left. After full text screening, 19 (randomized) controlled trials and 20 observational studies were included. The overall methodological quality of the included studies, rated by GRADE criteria, was very low. Two out of 21 combined intervention trials showed a statistical significant effect. Meta-analysis of 18 RCTs and 3 observational studies showed a significant benefit of combined modality interventions (OR 1.67, 95% C.I.: 1.24-2.26, p = 0.0008) and behavioural interventions (OR 1.33, 95% C.I.: 1.02 - 1.74, p = 0.03), but not for single modality pharmacological interventions (OR 1.11; 95% C.I.: 0.69-1.78, p = 0.66). CONCLUSION: A combination of pharmacological and behavioural interventions may be the most effective intervention for smoking cessation in patients with cancer.

The Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R): Real-World Data on Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Curative Chemoradiation.

INTRODUCTION: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care in inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, favoring concurrent (cCRT) over sequential CRT (seqCRT), with adjuvant immunotherapy in responders. Elderly and frail NSCLC patients have generally been excluded from trials in the past. In elderly patients however, the higher treatment related morbidity of cCRT, may outweigh the possible lower tumor control of seqCRT. For elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC real-world data is essential to be able to balance treatment toxicity and treatment outcome. The aim of this study is to analyze acute toxicity and 3-month mortality of curative chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC and to analyze whether cCRT for elderly stage III NSCLC patients is safe. METHODS: The Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R) is a national lung cancer audit that started in 2013 for patients treated with curative intent radiotherapy. All Dutch patients treated for stage III NSCLC between 2015 and 2018 with seqCRT or cCRT for (primary or recurrent) stage III lung cancer are included in this population-based study. Information was collected on patient, tumor- and treatment characteristics and the incidence and severity of acute non-hematological toxicity (CTCAE-4 version 4.03) and mortality within 3 months after the end of radiotherapy. To evaluate the association between prognostic factors and outcome (acute toxicity and mortality within 3 months), an univariable and multivariable analysis was performed. The definition of cCRT was:radiotherapy started within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Out of all 20 Dutch departments of radiation oncology, 19 centers participated in the registry. A total of 2942 NSCLC stage III patients were treated with CRT. Of these 67.2% (n = 1977) were treated with cCRT (median age 66 years) and 32.8% (n = 965) were treated with seqCRT (median age 69 years). Good performance status (WHO 0-1) was scored in 88.6% for patients treated with cCRT and in 71.0% in the patients treated with seqCRT. Acute nonhematological 3-month toxicity (CTCAE grade ≥3 or radiation pneumonitis grade ≥2) was scored in 21.9% of the patients treated with cCRT and in 17.7% of the patients treated with seqCRT. The univariable analysis for acute toxicity showed significantly increased toxicity for cCRT (P = .008), WHO ≥2 (P = .006), and TNM IIIC (P = .031). The multivariable analysis for acute toxicity was significant for cCRT (P = .015), WHO ≥2 (P = .001) and TNM IIIC (P = .016). The univariable analysis for 3-month mortality showed significance for seqCRT (P = .025), WHO ≥2 (P < .001), higher cumulative radiotherapy dose (P < .001), higher gross tumor volume total (P = .020) and male patients (p < .001). None of these variables reached significance in the multivariable analysis for 3-month mortality. CONCLUSION: In this national lung cancer audit of inoperable NSCLC patients, 3-month toxicity was significantly higher in patients treated with cCRT (21.9% vs. 17.7% for seqCRT) higher TNM stage IIIC, and poor performance (WHO≥2) patients.The 3-months mortality was not significantly different for tested parameters. Age was not a risk factor for acute toxicity, nor 3 months mortality.

A randomized phase-II study of reirradiation and hyperthermia versus reirradiation and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy for locally recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area.

BACKGROUND: In patients with inoperable local regional recurrences of breast cancer in previously irradiated areas, local control is difficult to maintain and treatment options are limited. The Dutch standard treatment for such recurrences is reirradiation combined with hyperthermia. Apart from enhancing the effect of reirradiation, hyperthermia is also known to improve local effects of chemotherapy like cisplatin. This randomized phase-II trial compares reirradiation and hyperthermia versus the same treatment combined with cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2010 up to January 2019, 49 patients were randomized, 27 in the standard arm and 22 in the combined arm. A total of 32 Gy was given in eight fractions of 4 Gy in 4 weeks, at two fractions per week. After January 2015, the radiation schedule was changed to 46 Gy in 23 fractions of 2 Gy, at five fractions per week. Hyperthermia was added once a week after radiotherapy. The combined arm was treated with four cycles of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. RESULTS: Complete response rate was 60.9% in the standard arm and 61.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.87). Partial response rate was 30.4% in the standard arm and 33.3% in the combined arm (p = 0.79). One-year overall survival was 63.4% in the standard arm and 57.4% in the combined arm. One-year local progression-free interval was 81.5% in the standard arm and 88.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.95). Twenty-five percentage of patients in the standard arm experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity and 29% of patients in the combined arm (p = 0.79). CONCLUSION: No potential benefit could be detected of adding cisplatin to reirradiation and hyperthermia in patients with recurrent breast cancer in a previously irradiated area. With or without cisplatin, most patients had subsequent local control until last follow-up or death.

Gamma-H2AX Foci Decay Ratio as a Stronger Predictive Factor of Late Radiation Toxicity Than Dose-Volume Parameters in a Prospective Cohort of Prostate Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Late radiation toxicity is a major dose-limiting factor in curative cancer radiation therapy. Previous studies identified several risk factors for late radiation toxicity, including both dose-volume factors and genetic predisposition. Herein, we investigated the contribution of genetic predisposition, particularly compared with dose-volume factors, to the risk of late radiation toxicity in patients treated with highly conformal radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 179 patients with prostate cancer who underwent treatment with curative external beam radiation therapy between 2009 and 2013. Toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Transcriptional responsiveness of homologous recombination repair genes and γ-H2AX foci decay ratios (FDRs) were determined in ex vivo irradiated lymphocytes in a previous analysis. Dose-volume parameters were retrieved by delineating the organs at risk (OARs) on CT planning images. Associations between risk factors and grade ≥2 urinary and bowel late radiation toxicities were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The analyses were performed using the highest toxicity grade recorded during the follow-up per patient. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 31 months. One hundred and one patients (56%) developed grade ≥2 late radiation toxicity. Cumulative rates for urinary and bowel grade ≥2 late toxicities were 46% and 17%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with grade ≥2 late toxicity were transurethral resection of the prostate (P = .013), γ-H2AX FDR <3.41 (P = .008), and rectum V70 >11.52% (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that impaired DNA double-strand break repair in lymphocytes, as quantified by γ-H2AX FDR, is the most critical determining factor of late radiation toxicity. The limited influence of dose-volume parameters could be due to the use of increasingly conformal techniques, leading to improved dose-volume parameters of the organs at risk.

The Dutch-Belgian Registry of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases: Clinical Outcomes of 515 Patients and 668 Metastases.

PURPOSE: Although various studies have reported that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases has high local control rates and relatively low toxicity, most series included a small number of patients. We aimed to validate these outcomes in a large multi-institution patient cohort treated in accordance with a common protocol. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A shared web-based registry of patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT was developed by 13 centers (12 in the Netherlands and 1 in Belgium). All the centers had previously agreed on the items to be collected, the fractionation schemes, and the organs-at-risk constraints to be applied. Follow-up was performed at the discretion of the centers. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were entered in the registry. Only liver metastases treated individually as independent targets and with at least 1 radiologic follow-up examination were considered for local control analysis. Toxicity of grade 3 or greater was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (v4.03). RESULTS: Between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2019, a total of 515 patients were entered in the web-based registry. The median age was 71 years. In total, 668 liver metastases were registered, and 447 were included for local control analysis. The most common primary tumor origin was colorectal cancer (80.3%), followed by lung cancer (8.9%) and breast cancer (4%). The most-used fractionation scheme was 3x18-20 Gy (36.0%), followed by 8x7.5 Gy (31.8%), 5x11-12 Gy (25.5%), and 12x5 Gy (6.7%). The median follow-up time was 1.1 years for local control and 2.3 years for survival. Actuarial 1-year local control was 87%; 1-year overall survival was 84%. Toxicity of grade 3 or greater was found in 3.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study confirms the high rates of local control and limited toxicity in a large patient cohort. Stereotactic body radiation therapy should be considered a valuable part of the multidisciplinary approach to treating liver metastases.

Impact of Technique and Schedule of Reirradiation Plus Hyperthermia on Outcome after Surgery for Patients with Recurrent Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Combining reirradiation (reRT) with hyperthermia (HT) has shown to be of high therapeutic value for patients with loco-regionally recurrent breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term therapeutic effect and toxicity of reRT + HT following surgery of loco-regionally recurrent breast cancer using two different reRT regimens. METHODS: The reRT regimen of the 78 patients treated in Institute A consisted of 8 × 4 Gy twice a week using mostly abutted photon-electron fields. The 78 patients treated in Institute B received a reRT regimen of 12 × 3 Gy, four times a week with single or multiple electron fields. Superficial hyperthermia was applied once a week in Institute A and twice a week in Institute B. Both institutes started HT treatment within 1 hour after reRT and used the same 434-MHz systems to heat the tumor area to 41-43 °C. RESULTS: The 5-year-infield local control (LC) rates were similar; however, the 5-year-survival rates were 13% lower in Institute A. Most remarkable was the difference in risk with respect to 5-year ≥ grade 3 toxicity, which was more than twice as high in Institute A. CONCLUSION: The combination of reirradiation and hyperthermia after macroscopically complete excision of loco-regional breast cancer recurrences provides durable local control in patients at risk for locoregional recurrent breast cancer. Treatment is well tolerated with the 12 × 3 Gy schedule with limited-sized electron fields.

Concurrent Daily Cisplatin and High-Dose Radiation Therapy in Patients With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine survival, local and distant control, toxicity, and prognostic factors in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients with stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC (N = 154) staged with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography were retrospectively selected (2005-2015). CCRT consisted of daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m2) combined with 24 fractions of 2.75 Gy to a total dose of 66 Gy. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 22 months (range, 1-92 months) the median overall survival was 36 months. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-86%), 61% (95% CI, 54%-70%), 52% (95% CI, 43%-60%), and 40% (95% CI, 31%-51%), respectively. The local relapse-free survival at 5 years was 55% (95% CI, 44%-69%). Metastasis-free survival at 5 years was 53% (95% CI, 44%-65%). The incidence of severe gastrointestinal disorders (grade 3-5) was 11%, among which grade 3 radiation esophagitis was 8.4%. The incidence of severe respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (grade 3-5) was 8.4%, among which grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was 1.3%. Predictors of overall survival were lymph node gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.007; 95% CI, 1.000-1.012) and sex (HR, 0.500; 95% CI, 0.320-0.870) in favor of women. Although lymph node GTV was a predictor of treatment toxicity (HR, 1.010; 95% CI, 1.000-1.013), tumor GTV was the predictor for distant metastasis during follow-up (HR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.003). CONCLUSIONS: CCRT with daily low-dose cisplatin for locally advanced stage III NSCLC resulted in promising overall survival (3-year survival rate of 52% and 5-year survival rate of 40%) with low toxicity. Lymph node GTV, tumor GTV, and sex were predictors of overall survival, treatment toxicity, and distant metastasis.

18F-FDG-PET/CT guided external beam radiotherapy volumes in inoperable uterine cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with advanced stage cancer of the uterine cervix who undergo irradiation with curative intent, there is the necessity to treat all suspicious nodes on imaging. Our hypothesis was that adding fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computer tomography/computer tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to the imaging workup would alter the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) treatment plan, either resulting in an extended external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) field to the para-aortal region or an additional boost to suspicious nodes. Since extended field radiotherapy or additional boost can cause toxicity, our secondary aim was to assess the incidence of severe late bowel toxicity in patients treated with extended para-aortal EBRT-field and boost compared to elective pelvic radiotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were enrolled. First, the optimal radiation treatment plan (EBRT and boost) was retrospectively determined based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or FDG-PET/CT. Second, the severe bowel toxicity caused by the extended para-aortal field was assessed, based on the executed radiotherapy. RESULTS: Based on MRI 8/88 patients would receive EBRT with para-aortic extension, this was 21/88 for FDG-PET/CT. Based on MRI 47/704 lymph node regions would receive additional boost, while based on PET/CT 91/704. Late severe bowel toxicity was seen in 12/84 patients, 6/65 in the group who received elective pelvic irradiation and 6/19 with para-aortal EBRT and boost at common iliac and/or para-aortal lymph nodes. Significant worse overall survival was seen of patients who needed para-aortal irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of FDG-PET/CT leads to an extension of the elective EBRT volume and more suspicious lymph nodes receive a boost. However, when deciding to intensify radiation therapy, late severe bowel toxicity has to be taken into account.

Reirradiation + hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer en cuirasse (BCEC) do not have effective curative treatment options. Hyperthermia, the elevation of tumor temperature to 40-45 °C, is a well-established radio- and chemotherapy sensitizer. A total of 196 patients were treated with reirradiation and hyperthermia (reRT+HT) at two Dutch institutes from 1982-2005. The palliative effect was evaluated in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received previous irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. In all, 75% of patients received 1-6 treatment modalities for previous tumor recurrences. ReRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy given twice a week or 12 × 3 Gy given four times a week. Superficial hyperthermia was added once or twice a week. Tumor area comprised ≥½ of the ipsilateral chest wall. RESULTS: Overall clinical response rate was 72% (complete response [CR] 30%, partial response [PR] 42%, stable disease [SD] 22%, progressive disease [PD] 6%). The local progression-free rate at 1 year was 24%. Median survival was 6.9 months. Forty-three percent of our patients with CR, PR, SD after treatment remained infield progression-free until death or last follow-up. Acute ≥grade 3 toxicity occurred in 33% of patients, while late ≥grade 3 toxicity was recorded in 14% of patients. Tumor ulceration prior to treatment had a negative impact on both clinical outcome and toxicity. CONCLUSION: ReRT+HT provides sustainable palliative tumor control, despite refractory, extensive tumor growth. Compared to currently available systemic treatment options, reRT+HT is more effective with less toxicity.

Institutional experience in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

AIM: To investigate whether the impact of dose escalation in our patient population represented an improvement in local control without increasing treatment related toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between December 2002 and December 2013 were eligible for this study. Inclusion criteria were a Karnofsky performance status ≥80% and, according to the multidisciplinary tumor board, ineligibility for surgery or radiofrequency ablation. Exclusion criteria were a lesion size >6 cm, more than 3 metastases, and treatment delivered with other fractionation scheme than 3 times 12.5 Gy or 16.75 Gy prescribed at the 65-67% isodose. To analyze local control, CT or MRI scans were acquired during follow-up. Toxicity was scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients with 55 colorectal liver metastases were included in this study. We delivered 37.5 Gy to 32 lesions, and 50.25 Gy to 23 lesions. Median follow-up was 26 and 25 months for these two groups. Local control at 2 and 3 years was 74 and 66% in the low dose group while 90 and 81% was reached in the high dose group. No significant difference in local control between the two dose fractionation schemes could be found. Grade 3 toxicity was limited and was not increased in the high dose group. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT for colorectal liver metastases offers a high chance of local control at long term. High irradiation doses may contribute to enhance this effect without increasing toxicity.

Risk of Symptomatic Stroke After Radiation Therapy for Childhood Cancer: A Long-Term Follow-Up Cohort Analysis.

PURPOSE: Long-term childhood cancer survivors are at high risk of late adverse effects, including stroke. We aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of clinically validated symptomatic stroke (transient ischemic attack [TIA], cerebral infarction, and intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH]) and to quantify dose-effect relationships for cranial radiation therapy (CRT) and supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy (SDRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our single-center study cohort included 1362 survivors of childhood cancer that were diagnosed between 1966 and 1996. Prescribed CRT and SDRT doses were converted into the equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). Multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the EQD2 and stroke. RESULTS: After a median latency time of 24.9 years and at a median age of 31.2 years, 28 survivors had experienced a first stroke: TIA (n=5), infarction (n=13), and ICH (n=10). At an attained age of 45 years, the estimated cumulative incidences, with death as competing risk, among survivors treated with CRT only, SDRT only, both CRT and SDRT, and neither CRT nor SDRT were, respectively, 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-17.0%), 5.4% (95% CI, 0%-17.0%), 12.5% (95% CI, 5.5%-18.9%), and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.4%). Radiation at both locations significantly increased the risk of stroke in a dose-dependent manner (hazard ratios: HRCRT 1.02 Gy(-1); 95% CI, 1.01-1.03, and HRSDRT 1.04 Gy(-1); 95% CI, 1.02-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood cancer survivors treated with CRT, SDRT, or both have a high stroke risk. One in 8 survivors treated at both locations will have experienced a symptomatic stroke at an attained age of 45 years. Further research on the pathophysiologic processes involved in stroke in this specific group of patients is needed to enable the development of tailored secondary prevention strategies.

Distribution of lymph node metastases on FDG-PET/CT in inoperable or unresectable oesophageal cancer patients and the impact on target volume definition in radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is standard care for localised inoperable/unresectable oesophageal tumours. Many surgical series have reported on distribution of lymph node metastases (LNM) in resected patients. However, no data is available on the distribution of at-risk LN regions in this more unfavourable patient group. This study aimed to determine the spread of LNM using FDG-PET/CT, to compare it with the distribution in surgical series and to define its impact on the definition of elective LN irradiation (ENI). METHODS: FDG-PET/CT images of patients with oesophageal cancer treated with dCRT (from 2003 to 2013) were reviewed to identify the anatomic distribution of FDG-avid LNs. Tumours were divided according to proximal, mid-thoracic or distal localisation. RESULTS: About 105 consecutive patients entered analysis. The highest numbers of FDG-avid LNs in proximal tumours were at LN station 101R (45%) and 106recL (35%). For mid-thoracic tumours at 104R (30%) and 105 (30%). For tumours located in the distal oesophagus, the most common sites were along the lesser curvature of the stomach (21%) and the left gastric artery (21%). Except for the supraclavicular and pretracheal nodes, there were no positive locoregional LNM found outside the standard surgical resection area. CONCLUSION: Our results show a good correlation between the distribution of nodal volumes at risk in surgical series and on FDG-PET/CT. The results can be used to determine target definition in dCRT for oesophageal cancer. For mid-thoracic tumours, the current target delineation guidelines may be extended based on the risk of node involvement, but more clinical studies are needed to determine if the potential harm of expanding the CTV outweighs the potential benefit.

Clinical results of conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a focal simultaneous boost for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly or medically unfit patients.

BACKGROUND: For elderly or medically unfit patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, cystectomy or chemotherapy are contraindicated. This leaves radical radiotherapy as the only treatment option. It was the aim of this study to retrospectively analyze the treatment outcome and associated toxicity of conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using a focal simultaneous tumor boost for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in patients not suitable for cystectomy. METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients with T2-4 N0-1 M0 bladder cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 80 years. Treatment consisted of either a conformal box technique or IMRT and included a simultaneous boost to the tumor. To enable an accurate boost delivery, fiducial markers were placed around the tumor. Patients were treated with 40 Gy in 20 fractions to the elective treatment volumes, and a daily tumor boost up to 55-60 Gy. RESULTS: Clinical complete response was seen in 87 % of patients. Three-year overall survival was 44 %, with a locoregional control rate of 73 % at 3 years. Toxicity was low, with late urinary and intestinal toxicity rates grade ≥ 2 of 14 and 5 %, respectively. The use of IMRT reduced late intestinal toxicity, whereas fiducial markers reduced acute urinary toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Radical radiotherapy using a focal boost is feasible and effective for elderly or unfit patients, with a 3-year locoregional control of 73 %. Toxicity rates were low, and were reduced by the use of IMRT and fiducial markers.

Rib fractures after reirradiation plus hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer: Predictive factors.

BACKGROUND: Combining reirradiation (reRT) and hyperthermia (HT) has shown high therapeutic value for patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer (LR). However, additional toxicity of reirradiation (e.g., rib fractures) may occur. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of potential risk factors on the occurrence of rib fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1982-2005, 234 patients were treated with adjuvant reRT + HT after surgery for LR. ReRT consisted typically of 8 fractions of 4 Gy twice a week, or 12 fractions of 3 Gy four times a week. A total of 118 patients were irradiated with abutted photon and electron fields. In all, 60 patients were irradiated using either one or alternating combinations of abutted AP electron fields. Hyperthermia was given once or twice a week. RESULTS: The 5-year infield local control (LC) rate was 70 %. Rib fractures were detected in 16 of 234 patients (actuarial risk: 7 % at 5 years). All rib fractures occurred in patients treated with a combination of photon and abutted electron fields (p = 0.000); in 15 of 16 patients fractures were located in the abutment regions. The other significant predictive factors for rib fractures were a higher fraction dose (p = 0.040), large RT fields, and treatment before the year 2000. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ReRT + HT results in long-term LC. The majority of rib fractures were located in the photon/electron abutment area, emphasizing the disadvantage of field overlap. Large abutted photon/electron fields combined with 4 Gy fractions increase the number of rib fractures in this study group. However, as these factors were highly correlated no relative importance of the individual factors could be estimated. Increasing the number of HT sessions a week does not increase the risk of rib fractures.

Reirradiation and hyperthermia for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area: Size matters.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Treatment options for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area are limited. Hyperthermia, elevating tumor temperature to 40-45°C, sensitizes radio-and-chemotherapy. Four hundred and fourteen patients treated with reirradiation+hyperthermia (reRT+HT) in the AMC(n=301) and the BVI(n=113), from 1982 to 2005 were retrospectively analyzed for treatment response, locoregional control (LC) and prognostic factors for LC and toxicity. PATIENTS/METHODS: All patients received previous irradiation (median 50 Gy). reRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy-2/week (AMC) or 12 × 3 Gy-4/week (BVI). Hyperthermia was added once (AMC)/twice (BVI) a week. RESULTS: Overall clinical response rate was 86%. The 3-year LC rate was 25%. The number of recurrence episodes, distant metastases (DM), tumor site, tumor size, time to recurrence and treatment year were significant for LC. Acute ⩾ grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients. Actuarial late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity was 23% at 3-years. In multivariable analysis reRT fraction dose was significantly related to late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: reRT+HT is an effective curative and palliative treatment option for patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area. Early referral, treatment of chest wall recurrences ⩽ 5 cm in the absence of distant metastases, provided the highest local control rates. The cumulative effects of past and present treatments should be accounted for by adjusting treatment protocol to minimize toxicity.

Combining Mitomycin C and Regional 70 MHz Hyperthermia in Patients with Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Despite intravesical therapy with immunotherapy or chemotherapy intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression to muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. While intravesical hyperthermia combined with mitomycin C has proved effective to treat nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, there is less experience with invasive regional 70 MHz hyperthermia and mitomycin C. Therefore, we examined the safety and feasibility of this treatment combination for intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 20 patients with intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer were treated with intravesical mitomycin C (40 mg) combined with regional hyperthermia. Treatment consisted of 6 weekly sessions followed by a maintenance period of 1 year with 1 hyperthermia-mitomycin C session every 3 months. Regional hyperthermia was administered using a 70 MHz phased array system with 4 antennas. Toxicity was scored using CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) 3.0. RESULTS: The records of 18 of 20 patients could be analyzed. Median followup was 46 months. Of the 18 patients 15 (83%) completed the induction period of 6 treatments. Four patients (22%) discontinued treatment because of physical complaints without exceeding grade 2 toxicity. Toxicity scored according to CTC 3.0 was limited to grade 1 in 43% of cases and grade 2 in 14%. Mean T90 and T50 bladder temperatures were 40.6C and 41.6C, respectively. The 24-month recurrence-free survival rate was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with regional hyperthermia combined with mitomycin C in patients with intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer is feasible with low toxicity and excellent bladder temperatures.

Postoperative brachytherapy for endometrial cancer using a ring applicator.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the rate of vaginal, pelvic, and distant failures and acute toxicity after postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy (VBT) delivered by a ring applicator in women with high intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 100 patients were treated with VBT after a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for a Stage IA or IB (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009) intermediate-risk endometrial cancer; 26 patients received 30-Gy low-dose-rate, 74 patients received 28-Gy pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy. RESULTS: At a median followup of 37 months (range, 1-107), 6 (6%) patients showed failures. Three patients developed an in-field recurrence in the vaginal vault: 1 was isolate, whereas the other 2 showed simultaneous pelvic and/or distant failure. A fourth patient developed an out-of-field recurrence in the posterior vaginal wall of the proximal half of the vagina, including pelvic and distant failure. Two other patients showed only distant failure. The estimated 3-year actuarial rate of any vaginal recurrence was 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 0-6.3%). The 5-year overall survival was 84%, similar to that in the female Dutch population matched for age and date of diagnosis. The acute side effects were low, consisting mainly of the occurrence of temporary diarrhea (2%). CONCLUSION: Postoperative VBT by a ring applicator results in a low recurrence risk, survival rates comparable with the normal female population, and a very low risk of acute morbidity.

The use of equivalent radiation dose in the evaluation of late effects after childhood cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: In epidemiologic research radiation-associated late effects after childhood cancer are usually analyzed without considering fraction dose. According to radiobiological principles, fraction dose is an important determinant of late effects. We aim to provide the rationale for using equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2(α/ß)) as the measure of choice rather than total physical dose as prescribed according to the clinical protocol. METHODS: Between 1966 and 1996, 597 (43.8%) children in our cohort of 1,362 5-year childhood cancer survivors (CCS) received radiotherapy before the age of 18 years as part of their primary cancer treatment. Detailed information from individual patients' charts was collected and physical doses were converted into the EQD2(α/ß), which includes total dose, fraction dose, and the tissue-specific α/ß ratio. The use of EQD2(α/ß) is illustrated in examples studies describing different analyses using EQD2(α/ß) and physical dose. RESULTS: Radiotherapy information was obtained for 510 (85.4%) CCS. Multivariable analyses rendered different risk estimates for total body irradiation in EQD2(α/ß)-based vs. physical-dose-based models. For other radiotherapy regimens, risk estimates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Using the total physical dose is not adequate for advanced analyses of radiation-associated late effects in CCS. Therefore, it is advised that for future studies the EQD2(α/ß) is used, because the EQD2(α/ß) incorporates the fraction dose, and the tissue-specific α/ß ratio. Furthermore, it enables comparisons across fractionation regimens and allows for summing doses delivered by various contemporary and future radiation modalities. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Risk estimates of radiation-associated side effects expressed in EQD2(α/ß) provide more precise, clinically relevant information for cancer survivor screening guidelines.

Post-operative radiotherapy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of treatment policy changes in cervical cancer patients treated with adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy. METHODS: Between 1970 and 2007, 292 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy after a radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma. All patients received pelvic radiotherapy (40 Gy-46 Gy in 1.8 Gy-2 Gy/fraction). Vaginal vault brachytherapy boost (10-14 Gy) was increasingly used for patients with high-risk factors, and since 1993 systematically applied in patients with at least 2 of the 3 risk factors: adenocarcinoma, nodal involvement and parametrial invasion. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was introduced in this group of patients from 2000. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative risk of local recurrence (CRLR) was 13% (95%CI 9%-17%), resulting in an overall 5-year survival (OS) of 78% (95%CI 83%-73%). Since 1970, the OR for the 5-year locoregional recurrence risk (LRR) decreased from 2.5 to 1.15 (linear-OR=-0.02/year). The OR for the 5-year mortality risk reduced from 2.2 in 1970 to 1.0 in 2007 (linear-OR=-0.03/year). The largest risk reductions were observed before 1990 with a minor rise after 2002. The risk of severe late toxicity reduced from 1.8% to 1.5% (linear-OR=-0.03/year). The addition of concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy since 2000 may have benefited a subgroup of patients with squamous cell carcinoma, but not the patients with adenocarcinoma, and after introduction of chemotherapy the risk of severe late toxicity tripled from 2% to 7%. CONCLUSION: Since 1970, tumour recurrence risk and mortality have decreased, as radiation dose increased. The potential benefit of concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy could not be demonstrated in this nonrandomized study.

Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials.

PURPOSE: To analyze recurrence patterns in patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction treated with either preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus surgery or surgery alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recurrence pattern was analyzed in patients from the previously published CROSS I and II trials in relation to radiation target volumes. CRT consisted of five weekly courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with a concurrent radiation dose of 41.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions to the tumor and pathologic lymph nodes with margin. RESULTS: Of the 422 patients included from 2001 to 2008, 418 were available for analysis. Histology was mostly adenocarcinoma (75%). Of the 374 patients who underwent resection, 86% were allocated to surgery and 92% to CRT plus surgery. On January 1, 2011, after a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median, 45 months), the overall recurrence rate in the surgery arm was 58% versus 35% in the CRT plus surgery arm. Preoperative CRT reduced locoregional recurrence (LRR) from 34% to 14% (P < .001) and peritoneal carcinomatosis from 14% to 4% (P < .001). There was a small but significant effect on hematogenous dissemination in favor of the CRT group (35% v 29%; P = .025). LRR occurred in 5% within the target volume, in 2% in the margins, and in 6% outside the radiation target volume. In 1%, the exact site in relation to the target volume was unclear. Only 1% had an isolated infield recurrence after CRT plus surgery. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT in patients with esophageal cancer reduced LRR and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Recurrence within the radiation target volume occurred in only 5%, mostly combined with outfield failures.